Feeds for Google Alerts: Learn How To Create Google Alerts!

Last Updated on Thursday, 4 February 2010 09:12 Written by TheAutomator Thursday, 4 February 2010 09:12

Google Alerts can be a great way to keep updated on all the latest happenings on anything you wish!

Google Alerts is quick and simple to setup, simply Click Here and we’ll walk you through it!

Google Alerts

Learn More

Senior Marketers Need Greater Accountability

Last Updated on Wednesday, 3 February 2010 01:20 Written by TheAutomator Tuesday, 2 February 2010 03:00

Posted by randfish I ran across this survey data eMarketer released last week and my heart sank: This first chart looks innocent enough. It's when you look at the next one (from the same report) that things get ugly: As a CEO, an SEO, a web marketer and a participant in social media, this drives me absolutely crazy. The very last item on the list is "conversions, ROI, etc." If your pulse isn't pounding, you might need to cut back on the pharmaceuticals. Absolutely nothing in the analytics world should trump conversions and ROI for "senior marketers" or anyone else who cares about the success of a company. If you're thinking in terms of time on site or unique page views as primary metrics - metrics you'd describe in a survey as being those you're "most interested in" - there's a big problem. The web as a medium is designed to let you capture data beyond number of viewers or engagement level. It lets you track return visits and actions and build sophisticated models that predict what activities will drive up revenue and earnings in the most cost-effective ways. Why let it go to waste? This report from Forrester suggests that the spend on web marketing has a lot of growth, and social media in particular is poised for exceptional CAGR (Compound Annual Growth Rate). But, I'm tremendously concerned that if marketers obsess over metrics like time on site, unique page views and CTR, they'll miss out on the real opportunity of all these channels. ROI should be the ultimate metric - it should be the most important thing on every marketer's mind for every project and every channel. I'll grant that prioritizing the projects and investments that have the highest return is challenging, and even the best do it imperfectly. What worries me is that there are marketers who may be taking their cues not from the great analytics data suggesting that, although first-time visits from social media may have low value, over time, they can drive greater brand engagement, predict higher rates of repeat visits and eventually become buyers and brand evangelists, but from the onslaught of press coverage and media attention around social networks. If you're taking your clues about where to spend your marketing budget from the media, rather than experiments and data, get ready for disappointment. Likewise, if you're measuring the wrong thing, you'll never know the right place to spend those dollars. The beauty of online channels like SEO, landing page testing, conversion rate optimization, email marketing and, yes, social media is that the data tells a story we can read. So long as we're willing to hear the message, we can draw the connections to find the traffic sources that cost less and earn more. We can invest in those until the ROI from them diminishes to a point where other channels become viable. But only if we're paying attention to the metrics that matter. There have been tools, data and experienced professionals in this field, fighting these fights for over a decade now. Tragically, it seems that we're in for a long slog. p.s. We've filled up about 600/1,000 spots for Thursday's PRO webinar on SEO Analytics - feel free to join in :-) Do you like this post? Yes No Learn More

It’s a Feeding Frenzy for Keyword-Rich Domains

Last Updated on Monday, 1 February 2010 03:33 Written by TheAutomator Monday, 1 February 2010 03:33

Posted by MichaelC

It's a well-known fact in the SEO world that Google shows enormous favoritism in its rankings to domain names that contain one or more of the keywords being searched for. If your domain name is a close match to the search keywords all glued together, it's as easy as fishing with dynamite to get on page 1 of the SERPs for that search phrase. While some (like me) might argue (like, against Rand) that it's a flaw in the algorithm, it's not a bug--Google deliberately favors this kind of match. If the search is a company name, well the reasoning why [that phrase] .com should rank #1 is obvious...and for everything else, well...it's pretty reasonable for Google to presume that a site named, for example, www.lightbulbs.com is probably pretty much about light bulbs. Whether it's the BEST site for light bulbs is of course another story.

The net result of the world realizing that Google works this way is pretty predictable: mass buying of keyword-rich domains, and trying to turn those into top rankings and monster-sized site traffic. We're seeing three tactics here:

1. 301 redirection of keyword-rich domains
2. content-rich doorway pages on those domains
3. moving existing sites onto those domains

Before we dive into each of these in detail, let me throw out an example to help make all the details make sense. Apologies in advance to whoever actually owns these domains--y'all can just relax and think of this as just a free citation to help your local search :-)

Example: let's say your company is "xyzsignals.com", you sell cell phone repeaters, boosters, antennas, etc.

• page 1 of the SERPs for "cell phone repeaters" is dominated by domains with those words in the domain name
• being the devious and knowledgeable SEO that you are, you buy these domains: www.cellphonerepeatersystems.com, www.cellphoneboostersystems.com, www.cellphoneantennasystems.com

FYI, it's not necessary to add hyphens between your keywords; search for "web hosting" and see how well the non-hyphen versions rank. Also, hyphenated domains may be a red flag as many spammy domains have been built this way over the past few years.

OK, first up to bat: the quickie: buying the domains and 301'ing them to your site.



You buy these existing domains--perhaps they already have a bunch of juicy links to them. You HTTP 301 redirect everything from those sites to your main site, www.xyzsignals.com. Cool, right? Free link juice, immediately!

Not so fast...Google's ahead of you on this, and is looking for people who do this purely for SEO benefit. Matt Cutts is pretty clear on this in this video.

If you buy a domain, and immediately change the owning organization name, address, technical and admin contacts, etc., you can pretty much count on getting busted on this. At best, the sandbox....at worst, penalties.

If you're clever about it (I can't really tell you what to do, it's black-hat, but it's bloody obvious!) and avoid getting spotted as a domain buyer, keep in mind also that you'll likely have to move the domain to some new servers, which may in itself be a signal (when combined with registrar info changes) that the domain is no longer owned by the same organization, and perhaps past links shouldn't be counted as votes and hence flow PR.

Let's say you're smarter than the average bear, and get past that....what can you expect in terms of SEO results? Well, you're not going to see the keyword-rich domains in the SERPs, you'll see your own site. And you might think about the conversion effect of showing an URL with the phrase that matches the search phrase, versus showing your company name. My guess (and experience) would lead me to say that www.cellphoneantennasystems.com will get more attention from the searcher (hence clicks) than xyzsystems.com, presuming of course they searched for "cell phone antennas".

As well, there's some thought in the SEO community that the juice passed via 301s may decay over time anyway.

Lastly, let's say you're going all out and have bought 20-odd sites, each matching a target search phrase. Will Google spot a pattern if you redirect 20+ sites all to your 1 principal domain? If not today, probably soon...

On to Door Number Two: Content-Rich Doorway Pages


For each of the keyword-rich domains you've bought, you build light content, with a link/call to action that sends users off to the main site. The idea:

• the doorway domains will rank well
• users will click on them in the SERPs as the URL and title both will closely match their query phrase
• users will click the link on the doorway page to get to the main site

Most likely you will make it visually obvious to the user that the two domains are the same company (despite different URLs); the more black-hat approach is to make the doorway page appear to be a "review" site that recommends the main site, but of course, I wouldn't suggest such nonsense here.

The concern about buying the domain and changing the registrar info (and hosting ) all at once applies here as well. Tread softly....and slowly.

Once out of the sandbox (if you fall in at all), the doorway domains will rank really well for the key phrase, with proper on-page SEO and very light link-building needed.

So, is this black-hat? ask yourself: is there any reason to do this (for the human user) OTHER than search ranking? Does it honestly add value? Will it be detected automatically? Probably not....but...

If you're very successful at this, your competitors are likely to notice; you should BET on one of them submitting a manual spam report to Google; think about how you're going to explain to a Google engineer that you are doing this for some reason other than search rankings trickery.

A Beige-Hat Suggestion: if you go this direction, choose your main products and build a real site for each that offers Wikipedia-like information on each class of product, so that what you have is a generally useful resource for someone looking to buy a product like what you're selling; then, be upfront and put a "sponsored by" link to the section of your site that focuses on that product class on each page of the site; as well, a link on each page in the text to that same section.

You might create a mini site for each of those products, and talk about the pros and cons of the various types of each. Let's say on one page you're talking about the roof-mounted directional antennas - you could say on that page "At XYZ Signals, our most popular roof-mounted directional antennas are the ACME 3 antennas" and link both "roof-mounted directional antennas" and "ACME 3 antennas" to your main page for ACME 3 antennas.

Last, but not least: buying a keyword-rich domain and moving your entire site




This move isn't for the light-of-heart, even though it's pretty white-hat. You're still going to have issues with the sandbox, and to avoid this, need to execute this tactic over several months. Danny wrote a great post with all the details on how to move a domain a little while ago.

Consider putting up some light content on the new sites and watch the SERPs for a month or so to be sure the new sites are not sandboxed. Then, move all of the pages from your original site over, and 301 each page to the exact corresponding page on the new site EXCEPT the home page.

Retain your original domain and use it for a "corporate info" site; link to it from the new domain and vice-versa.

Finally, use the backlinks analysis from Open Site Explorer to find the important sites that link to the old site, and ask them to update their links to point to the new sites.

Technorati Tags

keyword rich domains, buying domains, seo tactics

Do you like this post? Yes No

Learn More